4.6 Article

18F-FDG PET complemented with sentinel lymph node biopsy in the detection of axillary involvement of breast cancer

Journal

EJSO
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 15-19

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2003.10.010

Keywords

positron emission tomography; breast cancer; axillary lymph nodes; sentinel lymph node

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim. The presence of axillary involvement is the most important prognostic factor in breast cancer. This study analysis the value of F-18-FDG PET in the detection of the lymph node status. Methods. This study includes 200 breast cancer patients. The PET scans were obtained after the injection of 370 MBq of F-18-FDG; the breast areas, axillary, supraclavicular and internal mammary lymph node chains were evaluated. In a subgroup of 100 patients the PET-FDG scan was complemented with the study of the sentinel. node (SN) in those cases which did not demonstrate pathological lymph node uptake. The standardized uptake value (SUV) was related to the tumour characteristics of size, histological. type, axillary status and histological. grading. Results. The sensitivity and specificity of PET-FDG in the detection of axillary involvement was 84.1 and 97.8%, respectively. Seventeen false negative cases were obtained, and were associated with tow SUV in the mammary tumour. In 15 cases the PET-FDG scans revealed pathological uptake foci that suggested involvement of the internal mammary chain. Conclusions. The PET-FDG avoids routine SN study in those cases presenting axillary uptake, but it must be complemented by sentinel node study in those cases without pathological uptake. The association of PET-FDG and SN improves the sensitivity in the detection of axillary involvement. Its sensitivity and specificity in the analysis of axillary status can be extended to the evaluation of the internal mammary chain. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available