4.5 Review

Conceptual issues related to the construction of prescriptive standards for the evaluation of postnatal growth of preterm infants

Journal

ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD
Volume 95, Issue 12, Pages 1034-1038

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/adc.2009.175067

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Oxford Partnership Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre
  2. Department of Health NIHR Biomedical Research Centres
  3. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Monitoring and interpreting the growth of preterm infants is a major clinical task for neonatologists. The effectiveness of this process depends upon the robustness of the standard selected. Concerns have been raised regarding the nature of the charts currently being used, as well as their appropriateness for present-day neonatal care. To overcome these problems, there is a need for new prescriptive standards based on a population of preterm infants without evidence of impaired fetal growth and born to low-risk women followed up since early pregnancy for precise gestational age dating. Preterm infants contributing to the new standards should be free of congenital malformations and major clinical conditions associated with impaired postnatal growth. These infants should receive standardised, evidence-based clinical care and should follow current feeding recommendations based on exclusive/predominant breastfeeding. This strategy should provide a population that is conceptually as close as possible to the prescriptive approach used for the construction of the WHO infant and child growth standards. New international standards constructed in this way should contribute to the evidence-based care of these preterm infants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available