4.7 Article

Racial variation in the prevalence of atrial fibrillation among patients with heart failure - The Epidemiology, Practice, Outcomes, and Costs of Heart Failure (EPOCH) Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages 429-435

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.09.035

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES This study was designed to determine the association between race and atrial fibrillation (AF) among patients with heart failure (HF). BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation is known to complicate HF, but whether its prevalence varies by race, and the reasons why, are not well understood. METHODS We identified adults hospitalized with confirmed HF within a large integrated healthcare delivery system. We obtained information on demographics, comorbidity, vital signs, medications, and left ventricular systolic function status. Atrial fibrillation was defined as AF or atrial flutter documented by electrocardiogram or prior physician-assigned diagnoses. We evaluated the independent relationship between race and AF using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS Among 1,373 HF patients (223 African Americans, 1,150 Caucasians), the prevalence of AF was 36.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 34.3% to 39.5%). Compared with Caucasians, African Americans were younger (mean age 67 vs. 74 years, p < 0.001) and more likely to have hypertension (86.6% vs. 77.7%, p < 0.01) and prior diagnosed HF (79.4% vs. 70.7%, p < 0.01). African Americans had less prior diagnosed coronary disease, revascularization, hypothyroidism, or valve replacement. Atrial fibrillation was much less prevalent in African Americans (19.7%) than Caucasians (38.3%, p < 0.001). After adjustment for risk factors for AF and other potential confounders, African Americans had 49% lower odds of AF (adjusted odds ratio 0.51, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.76). CONCLUSIONS In a contemporary HF cohort, AF was significantly less common among African Americans than among Caucasians. This variation was not explained by differences in traditional risk factors for AF, HF etiology and severity, and treatment. (C) 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available