4.8 Article

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of recombinant silk-elastinlike hydrogels for cancer gene therapy

Journal

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
Volume 94, Issue 2-3, Pages 433-445

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2003.10.027

Keywords

genetically engineered polymers; silk-elastinlike protein polymers; controlled gene delivery; cancer gene therapy; adenoviral gene delivery

Funding

  1. NIDCR NIH HHS [R01 DE014562-01A1] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objectives of this study were to evaluate: (i) the influences of hydrogel geometry, DNA molecular weight, and DNA conformation on DNA release from a silk-elastinlike protein polymer (SELP) hydrogel, (ii) the bioactivity and transfection efficiency of encapsulated DNA over time in vitro, (iii) the delivery and transfection of a reporter gene in a murine model of human breast cancer in vivo, and (iv) the in vitro release and bioactivity of adenovirus containing the green fluorescent protein (gfp) gene as a marker of gene transfer. Plasmid DNA was released from SELP hydrogels in a size-dependent manner, with the average effective diffiisivity ranging from 1.70 +/- 0.52 x 10(-12) cm(2)/s for a larger plasmid (11 kbp) to 2.55 +/- 0.51 x 10(-10) cm(2)/s for a smaller plasmid (2.6 kbp). Plasmid conformation also influenced the rate of release, with the rank order linear>supercoiled>open-circular. DNA retained bioactivity in vitro, after encapsulation in a SELP hydrogel for up to 28 days. Delivery of pRL-CMV from a SELP hydrogel resulted in increased transfection in a murine model of human breast cancer by 1-3 orders of magnitude, as compared to naked DNA. The release of a bioactive adenoviral vector was related to the concentration of the polymer in the hydrogel. These studies indicate that genetically engineered SELP hydrogels have potential as matrices for controlled nonviral and viral gene delivery. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available