4.5 Article

The importance of nurse-led home visits in the assessment of children with problematic asthma

Journal

ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD
Volume 94, Issue 10, Pages 780-784

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/adc.2008.152140

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [G0400503B] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To evaluate and identify potentially modifiable factors in children with problematic asthma by a nurse-led assessment and home visit. Design: Observational cohort study. Setting: A tertiary paediatric respiratory centre. Patients: 71 children, aged 4.5-17.5 years, with problematic asthma currently under follow-up at a tertiary respiratory centre. Interventions: A nurse-led hospital visit followed by a home visit. Main outcome measures: Identification and attempted change of exacerbating factors so that further investigations and consideration of off-label, potentially toxic, asthma therapies were not necessary. Results: Potentially modifiable factors were identified in 56 (79%) children. Many children had multiple causes for poor control. The most important were ongoing allergen exposure, 22 children (31%); passive or active smoking, 18 children (25%); medication issues including adherence, 34 children (48%); psychosocial factors, 42 families (59%). The home visit contributed valuable information to this assessment. At the home visit house dust mite avoidance measures were found to be inadequate in 84% of those sensitised; medications were not easily available for inspection or were out of date in 23%; 74% of psychology referrals were made after the home visit. In 39 children (55%) the factors identified and the interventions recommended meant that further escalation of treatment was avoided. Conclusions: Nurse-led assessments including a home visit can help identify potentially modifiable factors for poorly controlled symptoms in children with problematic asthma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available