4.7 Article

Clinical characteristics of magnetic resonance imaging-defined subcortical ischemic depression

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 55, Issue 4, Pages 390-397

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2003.08.014

Keywords

depression; aged; MRI; cerebrovascular disease; diagnostic criteria

Funding

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [P50 MH 60451, R01 MH 54846, K23 MH 65939] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: There is a substantial body of research supporting the vascular depression hypothesis of late-life depression. To update this hypothesis so it incorporates recent research, we propose that the term subcortical ischemic vascular depression may be a more accurate representation of the disease process. We sought to investigate this diagnosis as a construct by examining differences between depressed subjects with and without magnetic resonance imaging defined subcortical ischemic vascular depression. Methods. This case-control study examined 139 depressed elderly subjects. Demographic data, psychiatric, medical, and family history, depressive symptomatology, and functional impairment were compared between groups dichotomized based on neuroimaging findings. Results: Seventy-five (54%) of the subjects met neuroimaging criteria for subcortical ischemic vascular depression. Age was most strongly associated with increased prevalence of subcortical ischemic vascular depression. Lassitude and a history of hypertension were also positively associated with the diagnosis; a family history of mental illness and loss of libido were negatively associated with the diagnosis. Conclusions. These data support that subcortical ischemic vascular depression may be a specific syndrome from other types of late-life depression. Further research is needed to further characterize this disorder. particularly in regards to cognitive junction and treatment implications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available