4.7 Article

Long-term effect of combined vitamins E and C on coronary and peripheral endothelial function

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages 629-634

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.08.051

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA77839] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [P50 HL48743] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM15431] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES We tested whether long-term administration of antioxidant Vitamins C and E improves coronary and brachial artery endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). BACKGROUND Endothelial function is a sensitive indicator of vascular health. Oxidant stress and oxidized low-density lipoprotein (LDL) impair endothelial function by reducing nitric oxide bioavailability in the artery wall. METHODS We randomly assigned 30 subjects with CAD to combined vitamin E (800 IU per day) and C (1,000 mg per day) or to placebos in a double-blind trial. Coronary artery endothelial function was measured as the change in coronary artery diameter to acetylcholine infusions (n = 18 patients), and brachial artery endothelial function was assessed by flow-mediated dilation (n = 25 patients) at baseline and six months. Plasma markers of oxidant stress (oxidized LDL and autoantibodies) were also measured. RESULTS Plasma alpha-tocopherol (p < 0.001) and ascorbic acid (p < 0.02) increased with active therapy. Compared to placebo, there was no improvement in coronary and brachial endothelial vasomotor function over six months. Although vitamins C and E tended to reduce F2-isoprostanes (p = 0.065), they failed to alter oxidized LDL or autoantibodies to oxidized LDL. CONCLUSIONS Long-term oral vitamins C and E do not improve key mechanisms in the biology of atherosclerosis or endothelial dysfunction, or reduce LDL oxidation in vivo. (C) 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available