4.8 Article

Comparison of the kinetics and thermodynamics for methyl radical addition to C=C, C=O, and C=S double bonds

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 126, Issue 6, Pages 1732-1740

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja039139a

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The barriers, enthalpies, and rate constants for the addition of methyl radical to the double bonds of a selection of alkene, carbonyl, and thiocarbonyl species (CH(2)double bondZ, CH(3)CHdouble bondZ, and (CH3)(2)Cdouble bondZ, where Z = CH2, O, or S) and for the reverse beta-scission reactions have been investigated using high-level ab inito calculations. The results are rationalized with the aid of the curve-crossing model. The addition reactions proceed via early transition structures in all cases. The barriers for addition of methyl radical to Cdouble bondC bonds are largely determined by the reaction exothermicities. Addition to the unsubstituted carbon center of Cdouble bondC double bonds is favored over addition to the substituted carbon center, both kinetically (lower barriers) and thermodynamically (greater exothermicities). The barriers for addition to Cdouble bondO bonds are influenced by both the reaction exothermicity and the singlet-triplet gap of the substrate. Addition to the carbon center is favored over addition to the oxygen, also both thermodynamically and kinetically. For the thiocarbonyl systems, addition to the carbon center is thermodynamically favored over addition to sulfur. However, in this case, the reaction is contrathermodynamic, addition to the sulfur center having a lower barrier due to spin density considerations. Entropic differences among corresponding addition and beta-scission reactions are relatively minor, and the differences in reaction rates are thus dominated by differences in the respective reaction barriers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available