4.7 Article

The XMM-Newton iron line profile of NGC 3783

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 602, Issue 2, Pages 648-658

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/381091

Keywords

galaxies : active; galaxies : individual (NGC 3783); galaxies : Seyfert; X-rays : galaxies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report on observations of the iron K line in the nearby Seyfert 1 galaxy, NGC 3783, obtained in a long, twoorbit (similar to 240 ks) XMM-Newton observation. The line profile obtained exhibits two strong narrow peaks at 6.4 and 7.0 keV, with measured line equivalent widths of 120 and 35 eV, respectively. The 6.4 keV emission is the Kalpha line from near neutral Fe, while the 7.0 keV feature probably originates from a blend of the neutral Fe Kalpha line and the hydrogen-like line of Fe at 6.97 keV. The relatively narrow velocity width of the Kalpha line (less than or similar to5000 km s(-1)), its lack of response to the continuum emission on short timescales, and the detection of a neutral Compton reflection component are all consistent with a distant origin in Compton-thick matter such as the putative molecular torus. A strong absorption line from highly ionized iron (at 6.67 keV) is detected in the time-averaged iron line profile, while the depth of the feature appears to vary with time, being strongest when the continuum flux is higher. The iron absorption line probably arises from the highest ionization component of the known warm absorber in NGC 3783, with an ionization of log xi similar to 3 and column density of N-H similar to 5 x 10(22) cm(-2) and may originate from within 0.1 pc of the nucleus. A weak red wing to the iron K line profile is also detected below 6.4 keV. However, when the effect of the highly ionized warm absorber on the underlying continuum is taken into account, the requirement for a relativistic iron line component from the inner disk is reduced.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available