4.7 Article

Powerful, obscured active galactic nuclei among X-ray hard, optically dim serendipitous Chandra sources

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 348, Issue 2, Pages 529-550

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07341.x

Keywords

galaxies : active; infrared : galaxies; X-rays : diffuse background; X-rays : galaxies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a small sample of Chandra X-ray sources selected from the fields of ACIS observations which probe fluxes around the break in the hard band source counts. The targets of these fields include nine nearby galaxy clusters, one distant cluster and two powerful radio galaxy fields. The follow-up of this serendipitous sample was biased towards X-ray hard and optically dim sources mostly not seen on the Digitized Sky Survey; for these, we present X-ray fluxes, optical and near-infrared photometry leading to 51 photometric redshifts in all and 18 independently measured spectroscopic redshifts. Few sources are associated with the target fields themselves. 56 of 58 sources imaged in the K-band are detected at Kless than or similar to 20 with K-median= 18, and of these, 38 have hard X-ray count ratios and 24 of these are significantly hard with most of the counts emerging about 2 keV. We find that almost all are active galactic nuclei (AGN) hosted in massive early-type host galaxies with a photometric redshift distribution peaking at zsimilar to 1. Two type 2 quasars with intrinsic X-ray luminosity Lgreater than or similar to 10(45) erg s(-1), Fe Kalpha emission lines and absorbing column density N-H > 10(23) cm(-2)- and N(H)greater than or similar to 10(24) cm(-2) in one case - are discussed in detail; the sample contains at least 12 potential type 2 quasars in all. We discuss various detection strategies for type 2 quasars and calculate their inferred space density. This combines and extends a number of results from subsamples already published by us.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available