4.0 Article

Dietary fiber and risk of coronary heart disease - A pooled analysis of cohort studies

Journal

ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 164, Issue 4, Pages 370-376

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.164.4.370

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL58904] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Few epidemiologic studies of dietary fiber intake and risk of coronary heart disease have compared fiber types (cereal, fruit, and vegetable) or included sex-specific results. The purpose of this study was to conduct a pooled analysis of dietary fiber and its sub-types and risk of coronary heart disease. Methods: We analyzed the original data from 10 prospective cohort studies from the United States and Europe to estimate the association between dietary fiber intake and the risk of coronary heart disease. Results: Over 6 to 10 years of follow-up, 5249 incident total coronary cases and 2011 coronary deaths occurred among 91058 men and 245 186 women. After adjustment for demographics, body mass index, and lifestyle factors, each 10-g/d increment of energy-adjusted and measurement error-corrected total dietary fiber was associated with a 14% (relative risk [RR], 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-0.96) decrease in risk of all coronary events and a 27% (RR, 0.73; 95% Cl, 0.61-0.87) decrease in risk of coronary death. For cereal, fruit, and vegetable fiber intake (not error corrected), RRs corresponding to 10-g/d increments were 0.90 (95% Cl, 0.77-1.07), 0.84 (95% Cl, 0.70-0.99), and 1.00 (95% Cl, 0.88-1.13), respectively, for all coronary events and 0.75 (95% Cl, 0.63-0.91), 0.70 (95% Cl, 0.55-0.89), and 1.00 (95% CI, 0.82-1.23), respectively, for deaths. Results were similar for men and women. Conclusion: Consumption of dietary fiber from cereals and fruits is inversely associated with risk of coronary heart disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available