4.5 Article

Intranasal immunization with genetically detoxified diphtheria toxin induces T cell responses in humans: enhancement of Th2 responses and toxin-neutralizing antibodies by formulation with chitosan

Journal

VACCINE
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages 909-914

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2003.09.012

Keywords

nasal immunization; diphtheria vaccine; Th2 response

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We previously reported that intranasal immunization with a non-toxic mutant cross-reacting material (CRM)(197) of diphtheria toxin, formulated with chitosan, generated protective neutralizing antibodies in mice and guinea pigs. Furthermore, we demonstrated that intranasal delivery of a powder formulation of the CRM197-based vaccine was well tolerated and significantly boosted antibody responses in adult volunteers. Here we report that intranasal booster immunization with CRM197 alone or with chitosan induced systemic T cell responses. We addressed for the first time the induction of T cell subtypes following intranasal vaccination in humans. Intranasal vaccination with CRM197, like parenteral immunization with a conventional diphtheria toxoid vaccine, enhanced antigen-specific IFN-gamma production. However, formulation of the nasal diphtheria vaccine with chitosan significantly augmented Th2-type responses, which correlated with protective levels of toxin-neutralizing antibodies in intranasally boosted individuals. The results suggest that vaccines capable of inducing strong Th2-type responses, such as CRM197 formulated with chitosan, have potential for the development of a protective mucosal vaccine against diphtheria in humans. Furthermore, our findings demonstrate that mucosal subunit vaccines with appropriate delivery systems have considerable potential for booster immunization of adults. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available