4.7 Article

Olivine-wadsleyite transition in the system (Mg,Fe)2SiO4

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH
Volume 109, Issue B2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2003JB002438

Keywords

olivine-wadsleyite transition; 410 km discontinuity; phase relations; mantle geotherm; composition of the mantle

Ask authors/readers for more resources

[1] Phase relations of the olivine-wadsleyite transition in the system (Mg, Fe)(2)SiO4 have been determined at 1600 and 1900 K using the quench method in a Kawai-type high-pressure apparatus. Pressure was determined at a precision better than 0.2 GPa using in situ X-ray diffraction with MgO as a pressure standard. The transition pressures of the end-member Mg2SiO4 are estimated to be 14.2 and 15.4 GPa at 1600 and 1900 K, respectively. Partition coefficients for Fe and Mg between olivine and wadsleyite are 0.51 at 1600 K and 0.61 at 1900 K. By comparing the depth of the discontinuity with the transition pressure, the temperature at 410 km depth is estimated to be 1760 +/- 45 K for a pyrolitic upper mantle. The mantle potential temperature is estimated to be in the range 1550-1650 K. The temperature at the bottom of the upper mantle is estimated to be 1880 +/- 50 K. The thickness of the olivine-wadsleyite transition in a pyrolitic mantle is determined to be between 7 and 13 km for a pyrolitic mantle, depending on the efficiency of vertical heat transfer. Regions of rapid vertical flow ( e. g., convection limbs), in which thermal diffusion is negligible, should have a larger transition interval than stagnant regions, where thermal diffusion is effective. This is in apparent contradiction to short-period seismic wave observations that indicate a maximum thickness of <5 km. An upper mantle in the region of the 410 km discontinuity with about 40% olivine and an Mg# of at least 89 can possibly explain both the transition thickness and velocity perturbation at the 410 km discontinuity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available