3.9 Article

The Impact of Pruritus on Quality of Life The Skin Equivalent of Pain

Journal

ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 147, Issue 10, Pages 1153-1156

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archdermatol.2011.178

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To compare the impact of chronic pruritus and chronic pain on quality of life (QoL) using directly elicited health utility scores. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Convenience sample of patients attending the Emory Dermatology Clinic, Emory Spine Center, and Emory Center for Pain Management, Atlanta, Georgia. Participants: Adult men and women (aged >= 18 years) experiencing chronic pain or pruritus for 6 weeks or more. Main Outcome Measures: The mean utility score of patients with chronic pruritus was compared with that of patients with chronic pain. A regression analysis was performed to determine the impact of the primary predictor variable-symptom type-on the primary outcome variable-mean utility score (a metric representing the impact on QoL). Results: The study included 73 patients with chronic pruritus and 138 patients with chronic pain. The mean (SD) utility among patients with pruritus was 0.87 (0.27) compared with 0.77 (0.31) for patients with pain (P < .01). After symptom severity, duration, and demographic factors were controlled for, only symptom severity (0.03 [P < .05]) and single marital status (-0.12 [P =. 02]), but not symptom type (P =. 43), remained significant predictors of the mean symptom utility score. Conclusions: Chronic pruritus has a substantial impact on QoL, one that may be comparable to that of pain. The severity of symptoms and the use of support networks are the main factors that determine the degree to which patients are affected by their symptoms. Addressing support networks in addition to developing new therapies may improve the QoL of itchy patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available