4.6 Article

Primary pulmonary hypertension in families with hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia

Journal

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 373-377

Publisher

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.04.00085504

Keywords

pulmonary hypertension; transforming growth factor-beta; vascular disorder

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL49171, HL60056] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH) is a rare but severe and progressive disease characterised by obstructive lesions of small pulmonary arteries. Patients with PPH often have mutations in the bone morphogenetic protein receptor type II (BMPR2) gene, whereas some carry mutations in the activin receptor-like kinase 1 (ALK-1) gene, generally associated with hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) type 2, a vascular dysplasia affecting multiple organs. The aim of this study was to determine whether members of families with PPH and confirmed or probable HHT had ALK-1 mutations. ALK-1 and BMPR2 mutation analysis was performed on deoxyribonucleic acid from affected members of four families with PPH and confirmed or suspected HHT. ALK-1 mutations were identified in all four families and three novel mutations found in exon 10, leading to truncated proteins. In the fourth family, a missense mutation, previously reported in four independent HHT families, was detected in exon 8. Analysis of the BMPR2 gene revealed no exonic mutations in the probands with both PPH and HHT. The present data bring to 10 the number of reported families with primary pulmonary hypertension and hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia type 2, representing 16% of the 61 families with known activin receptor-like kinase 1 mutations. Such mutations might predispose to primary pulmonary hypertension, and specialists should be aware of the potential link between these two disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available