4.6 Article

Effects of obesity upon genioglossus structure and function in obstructive sleep apnoea

Journal

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 425-429

Publisher

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.04.00099404

Keywords

muscle; muscle contraction; muscle fibres; upper airway resistance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Obesity is a common feature of the obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. It can influence the structure and function of skeletal muscles. However, its effects upon the upper airway muscles have not been explored directly. This study assessed the structure and function of the genioglossus in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome and in healthy subjects (with and without obesity, defined by a body mass index >30 kg(.)m(-2)). Further, to investigate the effects of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment, patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome after at least 1 yr under CPAP were also studied. The study found that obese and nonobese patients showed different in vitro geniglossus endurance properties. In obese patients, geniglossus endurance was indistinguishable from normal while, nonobese patients, at diagnosis, showed increased genioglossus fatigability; this was not observed in patients treated with CPAP. By contrast, patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome showed at diagnosis a higher percentage of type II fibres than controls and patients under CPAP treatment independently of obesity. This difference is mainly due to a predominance of subtype IIb fibre. This difference was not observed in the group of patients treated with CPAP. Genioglossus twitch force was normal in all patients. These results suggest that different pathogenic mechanisms may underlie the development of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome in obese and nonobese patients. This observation may have potential clinical implications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available