4.1 Article

Rheumatoid arthritis does not reduce the pharmacodynamic response to valsartan

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages 245-252

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0091270003262951

Keywords

angiotensin II type 1 receptors; pharmacokinetics; pharmacodynamics; inflammation; rheumatoid arthritis; receptor down-regulation; drug-disease interaction; pro-inflammatory mediators; NO; C-reactive protein

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Inflammatory conditions decrease the cardiovascular response to calcium channel and beta-adrenergics blockers due, likely, to down-regulation of the receptors mediated by pro-inflammatory mediators such as C-reactive protein (CRP),nitric oxide (NO), and tumor necrosis factor. The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether down-regulation is also evident in angiotensin II type 1 receptors (AT(1)R) during varying inflammatory states. Normotensive subjects were divided into three groups according to the severity of disease: 14 with active rheumatoid arthritis, 12 with controlled rheumatoid arthritis, and 12 healthy control subjects. The AT(1)R antagonist valsartan (160 mg) was given to all the subjects, and blood samples were taken for pharmocokinetic analysis. The systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures were determined at all blood collection times. The degree of inflammation was measured using joint swelling, NO, and CRP. Plasma valsartan concentration was measured using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Patients with active disease hod significantly higher joint swelling, NO, and CRP than other groups. Plasma valsartan concentration-time curves were remarkably similar in all groups. No reduced response was noticed. Our preliminary observation suggests a need for further studies to examine the possibility of AT(1)R antagonists as alternatives to other cardiovascular drugs so that their potency may be reduced by inflammation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available