4.6 Article

Survival of allogeneic porcine retinal pigment epithelial sheets after subretinal transplantation

Journal

INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages 985-992

Publisher

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.03-0662

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NEI NIH HHS [EY10311] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE. To examine morphology after transplantation of organized primary porcine RPE sheets into the porcine subretinal space. METHODS. Primary RPE sheets were harvested from freshly enucleated female porcine eyes and embedded in a thin slice of 50% gelatin and 300 mM sucrose before subretinal transplantation into male pigs by using vitrectomy techniques. Thirty-eight animals that underwent surgery were observed for up to 3 months without immune suppression. RESULTS. Four days after surgery, the subretinal space contained a multilaver of heavily pigmented RPE that was predominantly Barr body positive. One month after transplantation, there was marked shortening of the outer segments with an intact external limiting membrane. The transplant bed contained a pigmented monolaver in some regions, whereas in other regions the graft was folded into multilayers with degenerated inner layers of transplanted cells despite synthesis of basement membrane. The choroidal vessels and choriocapillaris remained patent in the transplant bed. Barr body positive cells were still present 3 months after surgery. There was no infiltration of the graft site with inflammatory cells. CONCLUSIONS. Allogeneic RPE grafts survive in the subretinal space up to 3 months after surgery, and the choriocapillaris remains patent in the transplant bed, although there are many heavily pigmented cells within the transplant bed that are Barr body negative by 3 months. Further work is needed to produce uniform repopulation of a sizable portion of Bruch's membrane with a monolayer of transplanted RPE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available