4.6 Article

Environmental quality competition and eco-labeling

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages 284-306

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/S0095-0696(03)00078-0

Keywords

product differentiation; technology investment; socially optimal quality and investments

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A three-stage game of investment, environmental quality provision and price competition is developed to study the impact of green technology investment (eco-labeling), in a duopoly model of vertical product differentiation. The firms' incentives to Invest in green technologies depend on their relative cost structure. When firms are identical with respect to fixed costs, both firms will always invest, but if one firm is more efficient in investing, then the other firm may or may not invest depending on the level of unit cost of investment. Quality competition will be tighter when the low-quality firm is more efficient, and looser when the high-quality firm is more efficient in investing. Socially optimal investment for both firms is always positive, but lower than in the duopoly solution. In the absence of environmental externalities, the quality dispersion chosen by profit maximizing firms may be too high or too low, while environmental externalities increase the possibility low-quality dispersion that is too low within the market solution. Finally, and importantly, ecolabeling can be used as a means of reducing excessive investment and increasing environmental quality that is too low. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available