4.7 Article

Chain galaxies in the Tadpole Advanced Camera for Surveys field

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 603, Issue 1, Pages 74-81

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/381357

Keywords

galaxies : evolution; galaxies : structure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Colors and magnitudes were determined for 69 chain galaxies, 58 other linear structures, 32 normal edge-on galaxies, and all of their large star formation clumps in the Hubble Space Telescope Advanced Camera for Surveys field of the Tadpole galaxy. Redshifts of 0.5-2 are inferred from comparisons with published color-evolution models. The linear galaxies have no red nuclear bulges like the normal disk galaxies in our field, but the star formation clumps in each have about the same colors and magnitudes. Light profiles along the linear galaxies tend to be flat, unlike the exponential profiles of normal galaxies. Although the most extreme of the linear objects look like beaded filaments, they are all probably edge-on disks that will evolve to late Hubble type galaxies. The lack of an exponential profile is the result of either a dust scale height that is comparable to the stellar scale height or an intrinsically irregular structure. Examples of galaxies that could be face-on versions of linear galaxies are shown. They have an irregular clumpy structure with no central bulge and with clump colors and magnitudes that are comparable to those in the linear galaxies. Radiative transfer solutions to the magnitudes and surface brightnesses of inclined dusty galaxies suggest that edge-on disks should become more prominent near the detection limit for surface brightness. The surface brightness distribution of the edge-on galaxies in this field confirm this selection effect. The star formation regions are much more massive than in modern galaxies, averaging up to similar to10(9) M-circle dot for kiloparsec scales.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available