4.2 Article

Type I interferon receptor and response to interferon therapy in chronic hepatitis C patients: a prospective study

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIRAL HEPATITIS
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages 136-140

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2893.2003.00477.x

Keywords

IFNAR1; IFNAR2; liver tissue; peripheral blood mononuclear cells; PBMCs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The type I interferon (IFN) receptor consists of at least two subunits, IFNAR1 and IFNAR2. We previously found a correlation between IFNAR1 and IFNAR2 expression in liver, and a correlation in IFNAR2 expression, but not in IFNAR1, between liver and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). The aim of this study was to prospectively assess whether IFNAR2 expression levels in PBMCs as well as in liver act as markers for predicting response to IFN therapy in chronic hepatitis C patients. Fifty-two Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis C, were enrolled. IFNAR2 mRNA was quantified using competitive polymerase chain reaction, in liver and PBMC specimens, and of the 52 patients assigned to receive a 6-month course of interferon-alpha therapy, 36 patients who received more than 300 million units of interferon were analysed. IFNAR2 mRNA expression levels were significantly higher in liver than in PBMCs in all 36 patients (P = 0.016). Seventeen sustained virologic responders showed lower pretreatment hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA levels (P = 0.017) in serum and higher pretreatment levels of IFNAR2 mRNA in liver (P = 0.007), but not in PBMCs, compared with nonsustained virologic responders. In multivariate analysis, these factors were independently associated with a sustained virologic response (i.e. HCV-RNA level: odds ratio 0.23, 95% CI 0.038-0.864; and IFNAR2 in liver: odds ratio 1.116, 95% CI 1.015-1.227). Hence, IFNAR2 expression levels in liver, but not in PBMCs, is predictive of response to IFN treatment in chronic hepatitis C patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available