4.4 Review

Targeting the PD-1 pathway: a promising future for the treatment of melanoma

Journal

ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 306, Issue 6, Pages 511-519

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00403-014-1457-7

Keywords

Nivolumab; MK-3475; Ipilimumab; PD-1; PD-L1; Programmed cell death receptor 1; Immunotherapy; Melanoma; BRAF

Categories

Funding

  1. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health [UL1 TR000002, TL1 TR000133, KL2 TR000134]
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health [R33AI080604]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Advanced melanoma presents a significant therapeutic challenge to clinicians. Many therapies for metastatic melanoma are limited by low response rates, severe toxicities, and/or relatively short response duration. Cancer immunotherapies that act as immune-checkpoint inhibitors to block the localized immune suppression mechanisms utilized by tumors are undergoing development and clinical trials. A clinically relevant immune escape mechanism in melanoma is the activation of the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) receptor on infiltrating T cells. Activating PD-1 triggers an immune checkpoint resulting in inhibition of T cells directed against melanoma antigens and prevents the immune system from combating the melanoma. In Phase I clinical trials, two anti-PD1 therapies, Nivolumab and MK-3475, that block the PD-1 receptor to enable T cell killing have demonstrated objective tumor responses in patients with advanced melanoma. The purpose of this review is to present the available clinical evidence on anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy for the treatment of advanced melanoma. We also discuss limitations associated with anti-PD-1 therapy. The blockade of the PD-1-PD-L1 pathway has shown promising results in clinical trials and has revolutionized melanoma immunotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available