4.5 Article

Disulfide bonds in merozoite surface protein 1 of the malaria parasite impede efficient antigen processing and affect the in vivo antibody response

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages 639-648

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eji.200324514

Keywords

malaria; vaccine; antigen processing; merozoite

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [MC_U117532067] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. MRC [MC_U117532067] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_U117532067] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The 19 kDa C-terminal fragment of the malaria parasite merozoite surface protein 1 (MSP1(19)) is a leading malaria vaccine candidate. In rodents, high antibody levels to this protein confer protective immunity, and can be generated by immunization with the antigen in adjuvants. In natural human infections, however, MSP1(19)-specific antibody responses can be short-lived and comparatively low, despite repeated exposure to infection. The tightly folded structure of MSP1(19), is stabilized by five or six disulfide bonds. These bonds impede antigen processing and, thereby, may affect the generation of CD4(+) T cells providing help for B cells. Asparagine enclopepticlase could digest unfolded, but not native MSP1(19), in vitro. Immunization with unfolded MSP1(19) resulted in a faster antibody response, and a combination of unfolded and native MSP1(19) increased antibody responses to the native form. Immunization with either form of the antigen activated similar numbers of CD4(+) T cells, but, unlike the antibody response, CD4(+) T cells immunized with one form of MSP1(19) were able to respond in vitro to the other form of the protein. Although the reduced form of MSP1(19) does not induce protective antibodies, our data suggest that inclusion of unfolded protein may improve the efficacy of MSP1(19) as a vaccine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available