The parental perspective regarding the contralateral inguinal region in a child with a known unilateral inguinal hernia

Purpose: The management of the contralateral region in a child with a known inguinal hernia has been debated by surgeons for more than 50 years. However, the perspective of the child's parents has not been sought, and this study was designed to evaluate parental views on this topic. Methods: After IRB approval, all patients less than 10 years of age with a unilateral inguinal hernia seen by the senior surgeon were studied prospectively from November 2001 through February 2003. A study sheet was given to the parents about the nature of an inguinal hernia, the incidence of 20% to 40% of a contralateral patent processus vaginalis (CPPV), and the possible surgical options (perform repair of the unilateral inguinal hernia only, repair the unilateral inguinal hernia with contralateral exploration and repair if indicated, or unilateral inguinal hernia repair with laparoscopy through the ipsilateral hernia sac and repair of a CPPV if discovered). The parents of the last 113 patients requesting contralateral inspection were asked their motives (convenience or anesthesia concerns) regarding their decision. Results: One hundred sixty-seven patients comprise the study group. Twelve parents chose unilateral repair alone, 13 chose bilateral incisions with contralateral repair if a CPPV was found, and 142 chose unilateral hernia repair with laparoscopic contralateral inspection followed by repair if needed. Regarding their motives, 90 of the last 113 parents requesting contralateral inspection indicated that convenience was the primary motive. Surprisingly, only 21 exhibited concerns about their child undergoing a second anesthesia. Conclusions: When presented options regarding management of a unilateral inguinal hernia, parents preferred laparoscopic inspection and repair of the contralateral region, if needed, more for convenience than for concerns about a second procedure and anesthesia.