4.7 Article

Genotypic Variation in the Concentration of β-N-Oxalyl-L-α,β-diaminopropionic Acid (β-ODAP) in Grass Pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) Seeds Is Associated with an Accumulation of Leaf and Pod β-ODAP during Vegetative and Reproductive Stages at Three Levels of Water Stress

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 63, Issue 27, Pages 6133-6141

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b01729

Keywords

beta-ODAP amount; reproductive phase; seed yield; vegetative phase; water stress

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education of China [20110211110022]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2015DFG31840]
  3. State Technology Support Program [2015BAD22B04]
  4. Overseas Masters Program of Ministry of Education [Ms2011LZDX059]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [lzujbky-2015-br02]
  6. Chinese Scholarships Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) cultivation is limited because of the presence in seeds and tissues of the nonprotein amino acid beta-N-oxalyl-L-alpha,beta-diaminopropionic acid (beta-ODAP), a neurotoxin that can cause lathyrism in humans. Seven grass pea genotypes differing in seed beta-ODAP concentration were grown in pots at three levels of water availability to follow changes in the concentration and amount of beta-ODAP in leaves and pods and seeds. The concentration and amount of beta-ODAP decreased in leaves in early reproductive development and in pods as they matured, while water stress increased beta-ODAP concentration in leaves and pods at these stages. The net amount of beta-ODAP in leaves and pods at early podding was positively associated with seed beta-ODAP concentration at maturity. We conclude that variation among genotypes in seed beta-ODAP concentration results from variation in net accumulation of beta-ODAP in leaves and pods during vegetative and early reproductive development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available