3.9 Article Proceedings Paper

Impact of lead-free soldering processes on the performance of signal relay contacts

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCAPT.2004.825793

Keywords

contact performance; lead-free soldering; reflow soldering; signal relays; SMD; telecom relays; whisker

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Various legislations, rules and regulations in Europe [Restrictions of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (ROHS)] and Japan (Recycling Law for Home Electric Appliances) have either targeted restrictions or a full ban on the use of lead, to be enforced from 2001, 2005, and 2006 onwards. Next to these regulations, marketing arguments are becoming more and more important for so called GREEN products. Up to now, mainly tin-lead alloys have been used in electronics. The process temperatures usually applied have been in the range of 230 degreesC. All currently discussed lead-free alternatives for professional electronics need process temperatures which are at least 30 degreesC higher. In addition, the process duration is significantly longer. The combination of higher process temperatures and longer duration together results in a significant thermal stress on the precision mechanics of the relay. In order to guarantee proper functioning of the relay after the solder process with maximum process temperatures of 255 degreesC, the dimensional changes of the plastic parts must be less than a few micrometers in order to guarantee stable contact forces. The outgassing of the used insulating and sealing materials must be minimal in order not to pollute or contaminate the contacts. With the lead-free version of the IM relay, an identical performance and the same reliability during electrical and climatic endurance tests can be expected, even though relays were processed with typical lead-free soldering processes with temperatures up to 255 degreesC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available