4.4 Article

Pragmatist Philosophical Reflections on GMOs

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages 817-836

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10806-015-9569-4

Keywords

GMO crops; Michel Serres; Dichotomization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This essay examines the public debate about the agricultural biotechnologies known as genetically modified organisms, as that debate is being carried out in its most dichotomizing forms in the United States. It attempts to reveal the power of sharply dichotomous thinking, as well as its limits. The essay draws on the work of Michel Serres, who uses the concept of the parasite to reconstruct or reframe fundamental dichotomies in western philosophy; it attempts a similar reframing of the public debates about GMOs. The purpose of such a reframing is to create possibilities for dialogue among participants that will move beyond the polarization that characterizes much of the current debate in the U.S.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available