Journal
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 8, Pages 791-797Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/arclin/act077
Keywords
concussion; neurocognitive testing; reliability; validity; ImPACT
Categories
Funding
- International Brain Research Foundation
- Sports Concussion Center of New Jersey
Ask authors/readers for more resources
We present the initial validation of a two-factor structure of Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) using ImPACT composite scores and document the reliability and validity of this factor structure. Factor analyses were conducted for baseline (N 21,537) and post-concussion (N 560) data, yielding Memory (Verbal and Visual) and Speed (Visual Motor Speed and Reaction Time) Factors; inclusion of Total Symptom Scores resulted in a third discrete factor. Speed and Memory z-scores were calculated, and testretest reliability (using intra-class correlation coefficients) at 1 month (0.88/0.81), 1 year (0.85/0.75), and 2 years (0.76/0.74) were higher than published data using Composite scores. Speed and Memory scores yielded 89 sensitivity and 70 specificity, which was higher than composites (80/62) and comparable with subscales (91/69). This emergent two-factor structure has improved testretest reliability with no loss of sensitivity/specificity and may improve understanding and interpretability of ImPACT test results.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available