4.7 Article

Phase II randomized trial of autologous formalin-fixed tumor vaccine for postsurgical recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages 1574-1579

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0071

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: We conducted a Phase II clinical trial with randomized patients to determine whether autologous formalin-fixed tumor vaccine (AFTV) protects against postsurgical recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Experimental Design: Forty-one patients with HCC who had undergone curative resection were randomly allocated to the vaccine treatment (n = 19) or no adjuvant control group (n = 22). Three intradermal vaccinations were administered at 2-week intervals beginning 4-6 weeks after hepatic resection. A delayed-type hypersensitivity test was performed before and after vaccination. Primary and secondary end points are recurrence-free survival and overall survival, respectively. Observation continued until the majority of surviving patients had lived >12 months after the curative resection. Results: In a median follow-up of 15 months, the risk of recurrence in vaccinated patients was reduced by 81 % (95 % confidence interval, 33-95%; P = 0.003). Vaccination significantly prolonged the time to first recurrence (P = 0.003) and improved recurrence-free survival (P = 0.003) and overall survival rates (P = 0.01). AFTV played a significant role in preventing recurrence in patients with small tumors. Adverse effects were limited to grade 1 or 2 skin toxicities such as erythema, dry desquarnation, and pruritus. Conclusions: AFTV therapy is a safe, feasible, and effective treatment for preventing postoperational recurrence of HCC. Patients with low tumor burdens benefit from the treatment. This treatment should be advanced to a large-scale randomized trial.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available