4.4 Article

Subcellular localization of aflatoxin biosynthetic enzymes Nor-1, Ver-1, and OmtA in time-dependent fractionated colonies of Aspergillus parasiticus

Journal

ARCHIVES OF MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 181, Issue 3, Pages 204-214

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00203-003-0643-3

Keywords

Aspergillus parasiticus; OmtA; Nor-1; Ver-1; vacuoles; immunoelectron microscopy; immunofluorescence microscopy; microbodies; woronin bodies

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA52003-12] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The biosynthesis of aflatoxin in Aspergillus parasiticus is a complex process that involves the activities of at least 18 pathway enzymes. The distribution of these enzymes within fungal colonies and fungal cells is not clearly understood. The objective of this study was to investigate the distribution and subcellular location of Nor-1, Ver-1, and OmtA, which represent early, middle, and late enzymatic activities, respectively, in the aflatoxin biosynthetic pathway. The distribution of these three enzymes within A. parasiticus SU-1 was analyzed in time-fractionated, 72-h fungal colonies (fraction 1, 48-72 h; fraction 2, 24-48 h; fraction 3, 0-24 h). Western blot analysis and immunofluorescence microscopy demonstrated the highest abundance of Nor-1, Ver-1, and OmtA in colony fraction 2. Fungal tissues in this fraction were analyzed by immunoelectron microscopy. Nor-1 and Ver-1 were primarily localized to the cytoplasm, suggesting that they are cytosolic enzymes. OmtA was also detected in the cytoplasm. However, in cells located near the basal (substrate) surface of the colony, OmtA was predominantly detected in organelles tentatively identified as vacuoles. The role of this organelle in toxin biosynthesis is unclear. The relative distribution of OmtA to the cytoplasm or to vacuole-like organelles may depend on the age and/or physiological condition of the fungal cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available