4.2 Article

Utility of the RBANS in detecting cognitive impairment associated with Alzheimer's disease: Sensitivity specificity, and positive and negative predictive powers

Journal

ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages 603-612

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.acn.2008.06.004

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; dementia; diagnostic accuracy; Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [K23 AG028417] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although initially developed as a brief dementia battery, the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) has not yet demonstrated its sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive powers in detecting cognitive impairment in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Therefore, the current study examined the clinical utility of the RBANS by comparing two age-, education-, and gender-matched groups: patients with AD (n=69) and comparators (n=69). Significant differences (P<0.001) were observed on the RBANS Total score, all 5 Indexes, and all 12 subtests, with patients performing worse than the comparison participants. An optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity oil RBANS scores was obtained when cutoffs of one and one and a half standard deviations below the mean of the comparison sample were implemented. Areas under the Receiver operating Characteristic curves for all RBANS Indexes were impressive though Immediate and Delayed Memory Indexes were excellent (0.96 and 0.98, respectively). Results Suggest that RBANS scores yield excellent estimates of diagnostic accuracy and that the RBANS is a Useful screening tool in detection of cognitive deficits associated with AD. (C) 2008 National Academy of Neuropsychology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available