4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Roots regulate ion transport in the rhizosphere to counteract reduced mobility in dry soil

Journal

PLANT AND SOIL
Volume 260, Issue 1-2, Pages 79-88

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/B:PLSO.0000030191.92338.6a

Keywords

diffusion; high molecular exudates; low molecular exudates; oat; plant nutrition; simulation model; soil moisture content; sugar beet

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diffusion of ions in the soil depends on soil moisture content. In a dry soil, transport of nutrients towards the root and the concomitant uptake could be reduced. However, pot and field experiments showed that this is not always the case. The objective of this paper was to investigate possible mechanisms of plants to counteract reduced nutrient supply due to water shortage. A split root system was used to investigate P and K inflow of oat and sugar beet at different soil moisture contents (Theta) without water shortage for the plant. The measured average P and K inflows were compared to model calculations considering diffusion, mass-flow, sorption and uptake processes. In the calculations, soil dryness impeded diffusion and decreased nutrient inflow as expected. Measured K inflow was decreased in a similar way indicating that Theta influences K diffusion. In contrast to this, measured P inflow was not influenced by Theta and under-estimated by the model. Low and high molecular exudates were collected at different water supply levels showing that exudation rate of both compounds was increased at water shortage. Especially the high molecular exudates (i.e. mainly mucilage) from water-stressed plants increased P concentration in soil solution under dry conditions in an incubation experiment. Calculated inflow considering this increased P concentration agreed well with measured P inflow indicating that exudation of mucilage could be a mechanism to overcome nutrient transport problems due to soil dryness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available