4.4 Article

Striatal dopamine D2 receptor density in neuroleptic-naive and in neuroleptic-free schizophrenic patients:: an 123I-IBZM-SPECT study

Journal

PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 172, Issue 2, Pages 165-169

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-003-1644-2

Keywords

SPECT; I-IBZM; schizophrenia; antipsychotics; D; receptors; up-regulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most post-mortem autoradiographic studies have described striatal dopamine D-2 receptor up-regulation due to chronic neuroleptic exposure. The aim of our study was to compare in-vivo striatal D-2 receptor density in neuroleptic-naive and neuroleptic-free schizophrenic patients. We included 28 young (mean age: 28+/-8 years) acute psychotic patients meeting DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia or schizophreniform disorder. Enrolled patients were either first-episode neuroleptic-naive (n=12) or neuroleptic-free (n=16) after a minimum washout period of 7 days. All neuroleptic-free subjects had previously received neuroleptic treatment for a median period of 3.5 years. Both groups were evaluated using standard clinical scales. In-vivo striatal D-2 receptor binding was assessed by basal ganglia/frontal cortex ratios using I-123-IBZM SPECT. No statistically significant differences were found in age or clinical assessment between neuroleptic-naive and neuroleptic-free schizophrenic patients. No differences were found in the basal ganglia/frontal cortex ratios of neuroleptic-naive (1.78+/-0.11) and neuroleptic-free (1.81+/-0.15) patients. No striatal uptake laterality was observed in either group. No correlation was demonstrated between BG/FC ratios and duration of illness, period of neuroleptic exposure or time of drug washout. We conclude that our neuroleptic-naive and neuroleptic-free schizophrenic patients did not show differences in striatal D-2 receptor binding, suggesting that IBZM-SPECT fails to detect D-2 receptor up-regulation induced by chronic exposure to neuroleptic drugs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available