4.5 Article

Pretreatment prediction of brain tumors' response to radiation therapy using high b-value diffusion-weighted MRI

Journal

NEOPLASIA
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages 136-142

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1593/neo.03349

Keywords

diffusion-weighted MRI; high b-value; response to treatment; radiation; brain tumors

Categories

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS039335, R01 NS39335] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWMRI) is sensitive to tissues' biophysical characteristics, including apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) and volume fractions of water in different populations. In this work, we evaluate the clinical efficacy of DWMRI and high diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (HDWMRI), acquired up to b = 4000 sec/mm(2) to amplify sensitivity to water diffusion properties, in pretreatment prediction of brain tumors' response to radiotherapy. Twelve patients with 20 brain lesions were studied. Six ring-enhancing lesions were excluded due to their distinct diffusion characteristics. Conventional and DWMRI were acquired on a 0.5-T MRI. Response to therapy was determined from relative changes in tumor volumes calculated from contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI, acquired before and a mean of 46 days after beginning therapy. ADCs and a diffusion index, R-D, reflecting tissue viability based on water diffusion were calculated from DWMRIs. Pretreatment values of ADC and R-D were found to correlate significantly with later tumor response/nonresponse (r = 0.76, P < .002 and r = 0.77, P < .001). This correlation implies that tumors with low pretreatment diffusion values, indicating high viability, will respond better to radiotherapy than tumors with high diffusion values, indicating necrosis. These results demonstrate the feasibility of using DWMRI for pretreatment prediction of response to therapy in patients with brain tumors undergoing radiotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available