4.6 Article

The dynamical mass of the young cluster W3 in NGC 7252 - Heavy-weight globular cluster or ultra compact dwarf galaxy?

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 416, Issue 2, Pages 467-473

Publisher

E D P SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20031604

Keywords

galaxies : star clusters; galaxies : individual : NGC 7252; stars : fundamental parameters

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have determined the dynamical mass of the most luminous stellar cluster known to date, i.e. object W3 in the merger remnant galaxy NGC 7252. The dynamical mass is estimated from the velocity dispersion measured with the high-resolution spectrograph UVES on VLT. Our result is the astonishingly high velocity dispersion of sigma = 45 +/- 5 km s(-1). Combined with the large cluster size R-eff = 17.5 +/- 1.8 pc, this translates into a dynamical virial mass for W3 of (8 +/- 2) x 10(7) M-.. This mass is in excellent agreement with the value (similar to7.2 x 10(7) M-.) we previously estimated from the: cluster luminosity (M-v = -16.2) by means of stellar M/L ratios predicted by Simple Stellar Population models (with a Salpeter IMF) and confirms the heavyweight nature of this object. This results points out that the NGC 7252-type of mergers are able to form stellar systems with masses up to similar to 10(8) M-.. We find that W3, when evolved to similar to10 Gyr, lies far from the typical Milky Way globular clusters, but appears to be also separated from omegaCen in the Milky Way and G1 in M31, the most massive old stellar clusters of the Local Group, because it is too extended for a given mass, and from dwarf elliptical galaxies because it is much more compact for its mass. Instead the aged W3 is amazingly close to the compact objects named ultracompact dwarf galaxies (UCDGs) found in the Fornax cluster (Hilker et al. 1999; Drinkwater et al. 2000), and to a miniature version of the compact elliptical M 32. These objects start populating a previously deserted region of the fundamental plane.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available