4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Risk factors for relapse and acquired rifamycin resistance after directly observed tuberculosis treatment: A comparison by HIV serostatus and rifamycin use

Journal

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 38, Issue 5, Pages 731-736

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/381675

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [T32 AI07291] Funding Source: Medline
  2. ODCDC CDC HHS [U52CCU300500-14-2, U52/CCU300466-22] Funding Source: Medline
  3. CSP VA [U52/CU300500] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We sought to determine the risk of acquired rifamycin resistant (ARR) tuberculosis associated with rifampin-versus rifabutin-based directly observed therapy and to assess the risk factors for relapse of tuberculosis. This observational cohort study included patients with culture-confirmed rifamycin-susceptible tuberculosis reported to the Baltimore City Health Department (Baltimore, MD) during the period of January 1993 through December 2001. Of the 407 patients, 108 (27%) were human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) seropositive, 161 (40%) were HIV seronegative, and 138 (34%) had an unknown serostatus. Three (2.8%) of 108 HIV-seropositive persons had ARR tuberculosis, compared with 0 of 299 persons with negative or unknown HIV serostatus (P = .02). Among HIV-seropositive patients, 3 (3.7%) of 81 who were treated with rifampin and 0 of 27 who were treated with rifabutin had ARR tuberculosis (P = .57). Among HIV-seropositive patients, the only risk factor for recurrent tuberculosis was a low median initial CD4(+) T lymphocyte count (51 vs. 138 cells/mm(3); P = .02). The median CD4(+) T lymphocyte count among patients with ARR tuberculosis was 51 cells/mm(3). ARR tuberculosis can occur with rifampin-based regimens, but in this study, the risk was not significantly higher than that for a rifabutin-based regimen.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available