4.6 Article

Predictive value of fear avoidance in developing chronic neck pain disability: Consequences for clinical decision making

Journal

ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
Volume 85, Issue 3, Pages 496-501

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.06.019

Keywords

fear; muscles; rehabilitation; whiplash injuries

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To improve clinical decision making in posttraumatic neck pain by investigating the additional value of fear-avoidance variables in predicting chronic neck pain disability. Design: An inception cohort with baseline assessment 1 week posttrauma and outcome assessment 24 weeks post trauma. Predictive factors include pain intensity, Neck Disability Index (NDI), catastrophizing, fear of movement (Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia [TSK]), and avoidance muscle behavior. Setting: Hospital emergency department of a general hospital. Participants: A consecutive sample of 90 people reporting of pain in neck or head region after a motor vehicle collision. Eighty-two subjects (91.1%) of the sample provided 24-week follow-up on the outcome. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure: The NDI assessing physical disability of subjects with neck pain. Results: By using a combination of the baseline NDI and TSK, it appears to be possible to predict chronic disability with a probability of 54.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 35.2%-72.3%) after entering the NDI (cutoff, 15) as a first test, and with a probability of 83.3% (95% CI, 70.3%-91.3%) after entering the TSK (cutoff, 40) in a second test. Conclusions: A simple rating of baseline neck pain disability within a week of the trauma, separately or in combination with a test for fear of movement, can be used to predict future outcome. Patients showing fear of movement can be offered an intervention that focuses on reduction of this fear.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available