4.8 Article

Survival of Mycobacterium avium in a model distribution system

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 38, Issue 6, Pages 1457-1466

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2003.07.008

Keywords

Mycobacterium avium complex; biofilm; nutrient; disinfection; pipe material

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A pilot study was designed to examine the impact of nutrient levels, pipe materials, and disinfection on the survival of M. avium in model drinking water distribution system biofilms. Studies showed that the survival of the organism was dependant upon a complex interaction between pipe surface, nutrient levels, and disinfectants. The findings showed that when no disinfection was applied, M. avium could be recovered from biofilms at nutrient levels of 50 mug/L assimilable organic carbon. M. avium concentrations were lower on copper pipe surfaces following disinfection with free chlorine as compared to monochloramine. However, due to the interference of corrosion products, chloramination of iron pipe surfaces controlled M. avium levels better than free chlorine. These data demonstrate the significance of pipe materials on the survival of M. avium complex in biofilms. Elimination of competitive heterotrophic bacteria on copper pipe surfaces by the application of disinfection resulted in a population of nearly 100% M. avium. Heat treatment of M. avium biofilms was affected by the pipe composition and organic content of the water. Effluent temperatures > 53degreesC were required to control the occurrence of M. avium in the pipeline system. Although additional studies are required using improved detection methods, the results of this investigation suggest that reducing the biodegradable organic material in drinking water, control of corrosion, maintenance of an effective disinfectant residual, and management of hot water temperatures can help limit the occurrence of M. avium complex in drinking water biofilms. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available