4.3 Article

A role for corticotropin-releasing factor in repeated cold stress-induced anxiety-like behavior during forced swimming and elevated plus-maze tests in mice

Journal

BIOLOGICAL & PHARMACEUTICAL BULLETIN
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 352-356

Publisher

PHARMACEUTICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.1248/bpb.27.352

Keywords

anxiety; repeatedly cold stress; corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF); specific alternation of rhythm in temperature (SART) stress; elevated plus-maze test; forced swimming test

Ask authors/readers for more resources

SART (specific alternation of rhythm in temperature) stress is known to cause anxiety-like behavior in mice/rats in several anxiety-related behavioral tests. In the present study, we investigated possible roles for corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and glucocorticoids in SART stress-induced anxiety-like behavior in two different anxiety-related behavioral tests. In the forced swimming test, CRF, administered intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) at 0.5-2 pmol/mouse, dose-dependently reduced immobility time in unstressed and SART-stressed mice. alpha-Helical CRF, a specific CRIT receptor antagonist, administered i.c.v. at 0.1-1 nmol/mouse, dose-dependently increased immobility time in SART-stressed mice, but not in unstressed mice. In the elevated plus-maze test, CRF at 10-20 pmol/mouse significantly decreased the time spent in open arms in unstressed mice. CRF at a high dose tended to decrease this time in SART-stressed mice, but this decrease was not statistically significant. alpha-Helical CRIT failed to modify the time in unstressed mice. In contrast, alpha-helical CRF at 0.38 and 0.75 nmol/mouse increased the time in SART-stressed mice. Both immobility time in the forced swimming test and time spent in open arms in the elevated plus-maze test in unstressed and SART-stressed mice were unaffected by adrenalectomy. These results suggest that CRIT plays an important role in anxiety-like behavior caused by SART stress.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available