Journal
ARCHIVES OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES
Volume 102, Issue 5, Pages 419-425Publisher
ELSEVIER MASSON
DOI: 10.1016/j.acvd.2009.02.009
Keywords
Arrhythmia; Radiofrequency ablation; Magnetic navigation
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background. - Magnetic navigation system (MNS) (Niobe, Stereotaxis, Saint-Louis, Missouri, USA) allows remote control of a radiofrequency ablation catheter using a steerable magnetic field and a catheter advancement system. Aims. - We report our initial experience of ablation of human arrhythmias using the MNS. Methods. - Eighty-four patients (mean age 54 +/- 17 years; 39 women) had an electrophysiologic study followed by ablation with the MNS using non-irrigated 4, 8 and 3.5 mm-tip catheters with three distal magnets. All. patients were symptomatic, with commonly-accepted indications for ablation: atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT; n = 37); typical atrial. flutter (n = 15); accessory pathway (n = 12); atypical atrial flutter (n = 7); ventricular tachycardia (n = 7); atria[ tachycardia (n = 3); paroxysmal atrial. fibrillation (n = 3). Electroanatomical mapping was used for atrial. flutter, atrial. fibrillation, atrial. tachycardia and ventricular tachycardia procedures (29 patients, 34%). Results. - Ablation was performed successfully in 69 (82%) patients. In 15 patients (18%), MNS technique was unsuccessful: seven typical atrial flutters, four accessory pathways, two left atrial flutters after atrial fibrillation ablation, one ventricular tachycardia and one AVNRT, in all these cases except one typical atrial flutter and two left atrial, flutters, success was obtained by switching to the manual technique by means of an irrigated catheter. Total fluoroscopy time was 14 +/- 11 minutes; operator exposure fluoroscopy time was 1.5 +/- 0.6 minutes; procedure time was 169 +/- 72 minutes. Conclusion. - MNS ablation is a feasible treatment for various human arrhythmias, with a high success rate. Mapping with a magnetic catheter is safe. However, magnetic ablation of typical atrial flutter remains challenging, probably because of insufficient pressure for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation. (C) 2009 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available