4.3 Article

Automated function imaging: a new operator-independent strain method for assessing left ventricular function

Journal

ARCHIVES OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES
Volume 101, Issue 3, Pages 163-169

Publisher

ELSEVIER MASSON
DOI: 10.1016/S1875-2136(08)71798-4

Keywords

speckle tracking; regional left; ventricular function; strain; AFI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. - Speckle tracking is a new technique based on pure 2D grayscale ultrasound acquisition allowing calculation of segmental strains. To facilitate clinical application, speckle tracking has been integrated into the most recent echocardiographic systems for quick, automated evaluation of left ventricular function (Automated Function Imaging, AFI). Objective. - To evaluate the feasibility, calculation time, accuracy and reproducibility of global longitudinal strain (GLS) from AFI in determining LV function in comparison to reference echocardiographic and angiographic methods-whatever the operator's experience. Methods. - Echocardiography was performed in 65 patients scheduled for cardiac catheterization using a Vivid 7 system. They were divided into 3 groups according to EF (> 55%, 35sEFS55%, < 35%). Image quality, global LV function parameters (ejection fraction, aortic flow, dp/dt) and segmental contraction were analyzed by one experienced operator and one beginner. GLS was obtained from apical 2, 3 and 4 chamber views. GLS was compared to both echocardiographic and angiographic EF, as well as to other echocardiographic parameters. Results. - GLS was obtained successfully in 97% of patients. Mean calculation time including correction of endocardial. detection was less than 60 seconds. GLS was significantly different between the 3 groups, respectively -18.1 +/- 2.5 %, -11.5 +/- 2.1% and -6.0 +/- 1.2% (p < 0.01). Strong correlations were observed between GLS and LV function (r from 0.68 to 0.87) with a high level of reproducibility. No difference was observed between experienced and inexperienced operators. Conclusion. - AFI is clinically applicable and an effective means of assessing LV function due to its short acquisition time, feasibility and accuracy, whatever the experience of the operator. (c) 2008 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available