4.5 Article

Making other earths: dynamical simulations of terrestrial planet formation and water delivery

Journal

ICARUS
Volume 168, Issue 1, Pages 1-17

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2003.11.019

Keywords

planetary formation; extrasolar planets; origin; solar system; cosmochemistry; exobiology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present results from 44 simulations of late stage planetary accretion, focusing on the delivery of volatiles (primarily water) to the terrestrial planets. Our simulations include both planetary embryos (defined as Moon to Mars sized protoplanets) and planetesimals, assuming that the embryos formed via oligarchic growth. We investigate volatile delivery as a function of Jupiter's mass, position and eccentricity, the position of the snow line, and the density (in solids) of the solar nebula. In all simulations, we form 1-4 terrestrial planets inside 2 AU, which vary in mass and volatile content. In 44 simulations we have formed 43 planets between 0.8 and 1.5 AU, including 11 habitable planets between 0.9 and 1.1 AU. These planets range from dry worlds to water worlds with 100 + oceans of water (1 ocean = 1.5 x 10(24) g), and vary in mass between 0.23Mcircle plus and 3.85Mcircle plus. There is a good deal of stochastic noise in these simulations, but the most important parameter is the planetesimal mass we choose, which reflects the surface density in solids past the snow line. A high density in this region results in the formation of a smaller number of terrestrial planets with larger masses and higher water content, as compared with planets which form in systems with lower densities. We find that an eccentric Jupiter produces drier terrestrial planets with higher eccentricities than a circular one. In cases with Jupiter at 7 AU, we form what we call super embryos, 1-2Mcircle plus protoplanets which can serve as the accretion seeds for 2 + Mcircle plus planets with large water contents. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available