4.2 Article

Two member subdivision of the Bima Sandstone, Upper Benue Trough, Nigeria: Based on sedimentological data

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFRICAN EARTH SCIENCES
Volume 104, Issue -, Pages 140-158

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2014.10.015

Keywords

Bima Sandstone; Lithofacies; Two-member model; Aggradational deposits; Braid bar deposits

Funding

  1. Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University, Bauchi
  2. Tertiary Education Training Fund (TetFund)
  3. Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU)
  4. National Centre for Petroleum Research and Development (NCPRD), ATBU, Bauchi

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Early Cretaceous Bima Sandstone is a continental succession in the Upper Benue Trough, Nigeria formally divided into the Lower, Middle and Upper Bima Members. Sedimentological data presented here indicates a two member model (Lower and Upper Members) is more appropriate for the formation. The boundary separating the two proposed members is exposed at the Bollere River, Bima Hill, Wuyo II, and Kaltungo Fault sections. The lithological differences between the two members are perhaps to a large extent a reflection of the sediments sources. The Lower Bima Sandstone Member was deposited in aggradational braided alluvial systems and contains well preserved overbank fines, avulsive and crevasse splay sandstones, and channel deposits. Pedogenic carbonates are also common features of these alluvial deposits in the Bima Hill. The Kaltungo Fault section exposes sediments of brief lacustrine setting within the Lower Bima Sandstone Member. The Upper Bima Sandstone Member was deposited in fully matured braided river with well-developed accommodation space in both shallow and deep fluvial channels. Sedimentation in this braided river was mostly on braid bars and with scarce channels. Preliminary delta(CTOC)-C-13 data along the Bollere River lithosection shows lack of any significant carbon isotope excursion suggesting climate, especially changes in aridity was not a major contributor in differences between the two members of the Bima Sandstone. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available