Journal
HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages 278-286Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hed.10368
Keywords
smoking; selection bias; recruitment; cancer, decliners
Categories
Funding
- NCI NIH HHS [CA95678, CA88610] Funding Source: Medline
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background. Despite the availability of smoking interventions for cancer patients, many eligible patients decline enrollment into such programs. We examined reasons patients provide for declining smoking treatment and compared treatment decliners to enrollees. Methods. Eligible cancer patients (N = 231) were offered smoking cessation treatment. During recruitment, demographic, medical (eg, cancer stage), and smoking-related behavioral (eg, readiness to quit) data were collected, and decliners stated a reason for refusal. Patients who enrolled in the cessation program (N = 109) were compared with those who declined (N = 122) in terms of recruitment data, and reasons for declining were compiled. Results. Decliners were significantly more likely to: (1) have head and neck cancer (vs lung cancer), (2) exhibit fewer physical symptoms (eg, shortness of breath), (3) report a lower readiness to quit smoking, (4) indicate no intention to quit smoking, and (5) smoke fewer cigarettes. A preference to quit without professional assistance was the most common reason for declining treatment. Conclusions. Our findings highlight important differences between patients who enroll in a smoking cessation program and those who decline and underscore the need for motivational interventions to facilitate enrollment into smoking interventions for cancer patients. (C) 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available