4.5 Article

Chromosome numbers and karyotype evolution in holoparasitic Orobanche (Orobanchaceae) and related genera

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
Volume 91, Issue 3, Pages 439-448

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.91.3.439

Keywords

chromosome number evolution; Cistanche; Diphelypaea; karyotype evolution; Orobanche; Phelipanche

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chromosome numbers and karyotypes of species of Orobanche, Cistanche, and Diphelypaea (Orobanchaceae) were investigated, and 108 chromosome counts of 53 taxa, 19 counted for the first time, are presented with a thorough compilation of previously published data. Additionally, karyotypes of representatives of these genera, including Orobanche sects. Orobanche and Trionychon, are reported. Cistanche (x=20) has large meta- to submetacentric chromosomes, while those of Diphelypaea (x=19) are medium-sized submeta- to acrocentrics. Within three analyzed sections of Orobanche, sects. Myzorrhiza (x=24) and Trionychon (x=12) possess medium-sized submeta- to acrocentrics, while sect. Orobanche (x=19) has small, mostly meta- to submetacentric, chromosomes. Polyploidy is unevenly distributed in Orobanche and restricted to a few lineages, e.g., O. sect. Myzorrhiza or Orobanche gracilis and its relatives (sect. Orobanche). The distribution of basic chromosome numbers supports the groups found by molecular phylogenetic analyses: Cistanche has x=20, the Orobanche-group (Orobanche sect. Orobanche, Diphelypaea) has x=19, and the Phelipanche-group (Orobanche sects. Gymnocaulis, Myzorrhiza, Trionychon) has x=12, 24. A model of chromosome number evolution in Orobanche and related genera is presented: from two ancestral base numbers, x(h)=5 and x(h)=6, independent polyploidizations led to x=20 (Cistanche) and (after dysploidization) x=19 (Orobanche-group) and to x=12 and x=24 (Phelipanche-group), respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available