4.6 Article

Olanzapine vs haloperidol: treating delirium in a critical care setting

Journal

INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages 444-449

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-003-2117-0

Keywords

delirium; therapy; critical care; olanzapine; haloperidol; Parkinson's disease

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To compare the safety and estimate the response profile of olanzapine, a second-generation antipsychotic, to haloperidol in the treatment of delirium in the critical care setting. Design: Prospective randomized trial Setting: Tertiary care university affiliated critical care unit. Patients: All admissions to a medical and surgical intensive care unit with a diagnosis of delirium. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive either enteral olanzapine or haloperidol. Measurements: Patient's delirium severity and benzodiazepine use were monitored over 5 days after the diagnosis of delirium. Main results: Delirium Index decreased over time in both groups, as did the administered dose of benzodiazepines. Clinical improvement was similar in both treatment arms. No side effects were noted in the olanzapine group, whereas the use of haloperidol was associated with extrapyramidal side effects. Conclusions: Olanzapine is a safe alternative to haloperidol in delirious critical care patients, and may be of particular interest in patients in whom haloperidol is contraindicated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available