4.6 Article

Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia: SCA2 is the most frequent mutation in eastern India

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY
Volume 75, Issue 3, Pages 448-452

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2002.004895

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 (SCA2) has been reported as the commonest dominant hereditary ataxia in India. However, India is an ethnically and religiously diverse population. Previous studies have not clearly indicated exact ethnic and religious origins, and must therefore be interpreted with caution. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of different SCA mutations in a relatively homogeneous population from eastern India. Methods: We identified 28 families with autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia from eastern India. Each underwent full clinical evaluation and were analysed for the presence of SCA1, SCA2, SCA3, SCA6, SCA7, SCA8, SCA12, and SCA17 mutations. In addition, haplotype analysis was carried out in seven of the 16 families with SCA2. Results: Seven patients from four (14%) families were positive for an expansion in SCA1 and 26 patients from 16 (57%) families were positive for an expansion in SCA2. No mutations were detected in the remaining eight families (29%). Most of the SCA1 and SCA2 families were Hindu from the state of Bihar. Five out of 26 SCA2 patients in this study did not have slow saccades. In addition, four of seven SCA1 patients had slow saccades. We found an association between the SCA2 CAG repeat expansion and the 285 base pair (bp) allele of microsatellite marker D12S1672, and also data supportive of the association between the expansion and the 225 bp allele of D12S1333, which has been previously described. Conclusions: We conclude that (1) although slow ocular saccades are highly suggestive of SCA2, that they are not universal, nor are they exclusive to this disorder and (2) SCA2 is likely to be the commonest dominant ataxia in eastern India, with further evidence for a founder effect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available