4.6 Article

Genotoxicity of streptozotocin in normal and cancer cells and its modulation by free radical scavengers

Journal

CELL BIOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 83-96

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/B:CBTO.0000027919.38379.28

Keywords

DNA damage; DNA repair; free radicals; HeLa cells; reactive oxygen species; streptozotocin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Streptozotocin (STZ) is an antibiotic which can be used to induce diabetes in experimental animals in order to have an insight into pathogenesis of this disease. To use STZ as a diabetogenic substance, its molecular mode of action should be elucidated. Using the alkaline comet assay, we showed that STZ at concentrations in the range 0.01-100 mumol/L induced DNA damage in normal human lymphocytes and HeLa cancer cells in a dose-dependent manner. Lymphocytes were able to remove damage to their DNA within a 30-min repair incubation, whereas HeLa cells completed the repair in 60 min. Vitamins C and E at 10 and 50 mumol/L diminished the extent of DNA damage induced by 50 mumol/L STZ. Pretreatment of the lymphocytes with the nitrone spin trap, alpha-(4-pyridil-1-oxide)-N-tert-butylnitrone (POBN) or ebselen, which mimics glutathione peroxidase, or pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (PDTC) reduced the extent of DNA damage evoked by STZ. The cells exposed to STZ and treated with endonuclease III (Endo III), formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase (Fpg) and 3-methyladenine-DNA glycosylase II (AlkA), the enzymes recognizing oxidized and alkylated bases, displayed greater extent of DNA damage than those not treated with these enzymes. These results suggest that free radicals may be involved in the formation of DNA lesions induced by streptozotocin. The drug can also alkylate DNA bases. This broad range of DNA damage induced by STZ indicates that the drug may seriously affect genomic stability in normal and pathological cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available