4.6 Article

Protective effects of silibinin on insulin amyloid fibrillation, cytotoxicity and mitochondrial membrane damage

Journal

ARCHIVES OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS
Volume 659, Issue -, Pages 22-32

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2018.09.024

Keywords

Amyloid fibril; Bovine insulin; Cytotoxicity; Silibinin; Mitochondria

Funding

  1. Research Council of the Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences (IASBS), Zanjan, Iran [100/151/9194]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A growing body of evidence suggests that secretion and assembly of insulin to amyloid fibrils reduce its efficacy in treating type II diabetes and may lead to dysfunctioning of several organs. The research presented here explores the effects of silibinin on the in vitro amyloid fibrillation and cytotoxicity of bovine insulin fibrils on SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells. Interaction of the resulting structures with rat brain mitochondria was also investigated. Using a range of methods for amyloid detection we showed that insulin fibrillation was significantly inhibited by silibinin in a dose-dependent fashion. Moreover, we found that silibinin was very effective in attenuating insulin fibril-induced neuronal toxicity characterized by decrease of cell viability, the release of lactate dehydrogenase, intracellular reactive oxygen species enhancement, morphological alterations, and apoptotic cell death induction. While insulin fibrillation products showed the capacity to damage mitochondria, the resultant structures produced in the presence of silibinin were totally ineffective. Together, results demonstrate the capacity of insulin fibrils to cause SH-SY5Y cell death by inducing necrosis/apoptosis changes and suggest how silibinin may afford protection. It is concluded that elucidation of such protection may provide important insights into the development of preventive and therapeutic agents for amyloid-related diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available