4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Thoracic and lumbar epidural analgesia via the caudal approach using electrical stimulation guidance in pediatric patients -: A review of 289 patients

Journal

ANESTHESIOLOGY
Volume 100, Issue 3, Pages 683-689

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200403000-00032

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Nerve stimulation guidance (Tsui test) has been reported to be an effective alternative to radiographic imaging for proper catheter placement. The purpose of this study was to examine the success rate and complications of continuous caudal epidural analgesia since the implementation of routine use of the Tsui test at the authors' institution. Methods: The authors examined prospectively collected data in their pediatric pain service database from 289 children who had attempted caudal placement of a lumbar or thoracic catheter between 1999 and 2002. Results: In five patients (aged 5 months-1.6 yr), the catheter did not thread to the desired level and was abandoned in the operating room (technical success rate, 98.2%). Of the remaining 284 patients, the overall analgesic success rate of all caudal route epidural analgesia procedures was 84.9%. There was no significant difference in adequate pain control (success) in infants (aged 1 day-1 yr) versus older children (aged younger than 1 yr). The most common adverse effects were pruritus (26.1%) and nausea and vomiting (16.9%). Of the patients in our study, 57.7% had urinary catheters in situ; of those who did not have a catheter placed, 20.8% experienced urinary retention. The incidence of respiratory depression was 4.2%, but the administration of naloxone for severe respiratory depression was never necessary. Three percent of catheters were removed because of suspected contamination, but no epidural abscesses or systemic infection were noted. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that epidural catheter placement via the caudal approach using the Tsui test is an effective and reasonable alternative to direct lumbar and thoracic epidural analgesia in pediatric patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available